<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cashiering the Teachers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.corkirish.com/wordpress/archives/1122/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.corkirish.com/wordpress/archives/1122</link>
	<description>ríomhphost: foghlamthoir@gmail.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 14:32:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.corkirish.com/wordpress/archives/1122/comment-page-1#comment-474</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 06:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corkirish.com/wordpress/?p=1122#comment-474</guid>
		<description>DMcM,, the reason is because sex education has sexualised children, leading to a rise in teenage pregnancies. Sex education is normally justified on the basis of REDUCING teenage pregnancies, but invariably has the opposite effect to that intended. See an article by Peter Hitchens on the subject at http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/debate/columnists/article-188374/This-poison-isnt-sex-education-like-child-abuse.html . Sex education is abused by the teachers to promote a range of causes, including homosexuality, abortion and promiscuity. And those teachers who are peddling this agenda to young children of six years of age in primary school are little better than paedophiles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DMcM,, the reason is because sex education has sexualised children, leading to a rise in teenage pregnancies. Sex education is normally justified on the basis of REDUCING teenage pregnancies, but invariably has the opposite effect to that intended. See an article by Peter Hitchens on the subject at <a href="http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/debate/columnists/article-188374/This-poison-isnt-sex-education-like-child-abuse.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/debate/columnists/article-188374/This-poison-isnt-sex-education-like-child-abuse.html</a> . Sex education is abused by the teachers to promote a range of causes, including homosexuality, abortion and promiscuity. And those teachers who are peddling this agenda to young children of six years of age in primary school are little better than paedophiles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DMcM</title>
		<link>http://www.corkirish.com/wordpress/archives/1122/comment-page-1#comment-473</link>
		<dc:creator>DMcM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 04:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corkirish.com/wordpress/?p=1122#comment-473</guid>
		<description>Hello,

Very interesting read. May I ask:
1. Why you believe sex education should be criminalised? 
2. What do you believe are the negative effects of sex education? (Most important) 
3. How should young people learn about sexuality? (Least important, ignore if you wish)

Most of the other points I can understand the reason behind, either because it is clear or because your other postings offer an explanation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>Very interesting read. May I ask:<br />
1. Why you believe sex education should be criminalised?<br />
2. What do you believe are the negative effects of sex education? (Most important)<br />
3. How should young people learn about sexuality? (Least important, ignore if you wish)</p>
<p>Most of the other points I can understand the reason behind, either because it is clear or because your other postings offer an explanation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.corkirish.com/wordpress/archives/1122/comment-page-1#comment-455</link>
		<dc:creator>David Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 09:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corkirish.com/wordpress/?p=1122#comment-455</guid>
		<description>Brilliant: I could not have put it better myself.

I have an interesting and exciting library of older A and O level papers, slowly building. Some of it, even I would be scared to sit, and I&#039;m fairly well-up still on this stuff...

The papers would also, specially in Sciences, need to reflect the more important modern advances. Therefore, the Sciences papers would of necessity get harder, and longer, every year, which is as it ought to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant: I could not have put it better myself.</p>
<p>I have an interesting and exciting library of older A and O level papers, slowly building. Some of it, even I would be scared to sit, and I&#8217;m fairly well-up still on this stuff&#8230;</p>
<p>The papers would also, specially in Sciences, need to reflect the more important modern advances. Therefore, the Sciences papers would of necessity get harder, and longer, every year, which is as it ought to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cashiering the Teachers &#171; Cork Irish &#171; The Libertarian Alliance: BLOG</title>
		<link>http://www.corkirish.com/wordpress/archives/1122/comment-page-1#comment-453</link>
		<dc:creator>Cashiering the Teachers &#171; Cork Irish &#171; The Libertarian Alliance: BLOG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 17:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corkirish.com/wordpress/?p=1122#comment-453</guid>
		<description>[...] Cashiering the Teachers [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cashiering the Teachers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

